How It Is Given
Getting Started
Most Common
Ongoing review
The first review is at three months, because that is when early side effects have settled and the full effect on symptoms is visible. After that, annual review is enough for most women. How we weigh it with Austin patients.
At three months
Scoring symptoms at the start feels like paperwork, and it is what lets a Austin review three months later measure change rather than guess at it. Whether your symptoms have improved, and by how much. We score the ones that bothered you most at the start so this is a comparison rather than a recollection.
Whether side effects have settled. Breast tenderness and spotting past three months usually mean the dose needs adjusting rather than that treatment has failed.
Blood pressure, and any bleeding pattern that needs explaining. Those two account for most of what would change the plan at this stage. Worth reading next: side effects, safety and risks and low libido for the rest of it. Blood pressure taken at home is useful to bring, and any unexplained bleeding should be raised before the Austin appointment rather than in its final minute.
What continues
Hormone therapy does not change the interval. It can increase breast density, which makes keeping to the schedule more important.
Unchanged by hormone therapy. It runs to the usual schedule for your age.
Rises after menopause with or without treatment, and it is worth tracking either way.
Not routine for everyone. Worth discussing with early menopause, a family fracture history or long-term steroid use.
What we do not do
There is a test we do not run routinely in Austin, and the reason is that its result would not change the dose. Routine estradiol monitoring is not standard practice. Dosing follows symptom control, and a level that looks low in a woman whose symptoms have resolved does not warrant increasing the dose.
Repeated hormone panels sold as optimisation add cost without adding safety. Levels are checked where absorption is genuinely in question, where a dose is behaving unexpectedly, or where testosterone needs keeping in range. There is more in hrt risks and benefits, who should not take hrt and mood changes and anxiety go further into it. Each extra panel added to a Austin follow-up should have a question behind it, or it is cost without safety.
More on safety
Six concerns, each taken one at a time, with the actual numbers.
What goes up, what goes down and by how much.
Learn moreCombined therapy versus estrogen alone.
Learn moreWhy the route into your body changes this one.
Learn moreThe contraindications, stated plainly.
Learn moreCommon questions
What gets checked, how often, and what is not worth measuring.
Patient reviews
I had been waking three or four times a night for two years and had been told it was just stress. The consultation actually went through my cycle history. Six weeks on a patch and I am sleeping through.
What I wanted was someone who would talk about the risks honestly rather than sell me something. They walked through the clot data and why a patch suited me better than tablets.
The brain fog was the part nobody warned me about. Having a clinician tell me it was a recognized symptom and not early dementia was worth the appointment on its own.
It took two dose changes before things settled, which they had told me upfront might happen. The three-month review was booked before I left the first appointment.
From the blog
Next step
A three-month review is part of the treatment, not an optional extra. It is booked at the first appointment rather than left to you to chase.
Consultations are by appointment. Prescriptions are issued only where clinically appropriate.